피드로 돌아가기
The Illusion of Data Custody in Legal AI — and the Architecture I Built to Replace It
Dev.toDev.to
Security

Legal AI fakes deletion — PRISM proves it cryptographically

The Illusion of Data Custody in Legal AI — and the Architecture I Built to Replace It

Victor Okefie2026년 4월 1일5advanced

Context

Standard SaaS deletion only flags records at the application layer. Vector embeddings, chunked text, and inference logs persist on servers. OpenAI standard API retains inference logs for 30 days. A lawyer needs provable, auditable deletion for regulatory compliance.

Technical Solution

  • PostgreSQL → enforce Row Level Security for database-level access isolation below application layer
  • Azure OpenAI → route inference through zero-retention enterprise infrastructure with contractual guarantees
  • PRISM → execute Atomic Purge in single transaction to destroy all data layers simultaneously
  • SHA-256 → generate Destruction Receipt combining document hash with timestamp as verifiable audit artifact

Impact

No specific metrics provided.

Key Takeaway

Data custody is an architectural foundation, not a policy add-on. A cryptographic Destruction Receipt proves what a deletion button cannot in legal contexts.


Legal AI systems에서 document 삭제 시 application layer confirmation 대신 Atomic Purge와 SHA-256 Destruction Receipt를 적용 시 regulator/ court에서 검증 가능한 완전 삭제 증명을 생성할 수 있다

원문 읽기